Needs Assessment of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Training in North American Pediatric Rheumatology Fellowship Programs.

OBJECTIVE: Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) is widely used in adult rheumatology practice for diagnosis of arthritis and procedural guidance; however, it is not yet common practice in pediatric rheumatology. MSUS is advantageous to the pediatric population because it lacks radiation and eliminates need for sedation. This study aims to assess interest in, access to, and barriers to MSUS training in pediatric rheumatology fellowship programs in North America. METHODS: A survey was developed by pediatric rheumatology providers with experience in medical and/or MSUS education and distributed via REDCap anonymously in March 2022 (Supplementary Material). Eligible participants included current and recently graduated (<1 year) pediatric rheumatology fellows at a North American program. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses using design-based Pearson chi-squared tests were performed. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 78% (88/113), and 75% reported some form of MSUS training during fellowship. Only 36% indicated their program had a formal MSUS curriculum. Of those with MSUS training, 23% reported adult-only MSUS education. Eighty-four percent felt MSUS would be beneficial to their career. Major barriers to MSUS training included lack of MSUS-trained faculty, lack of time, and lack of hands-on MSUS sessions. Those who had access to MSUS training were significantly more interested in MSUS than those without (P = 0.0036). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that North American pediatric rheumatology fellows have a strong interest in learning MSUS, but they face significant challenges in accessing MSUS training (lack of MSUS-trained faculty, time, and access to hands-on training). MSUS should be incorporated into fellowship curriculum; however, implementation remains a challenge.

Clinical Improvement in Early Onset Interstitial Lung Disease Using Rituximab in Children With Antimelanoma Differentiation-Associated Gene 5-Positive Juvenile Dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVE: Children with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) and antibodies to antimelanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5) are at increased risk of severe disease complications, including interstitial lung disease (ILD). Data regarding treatment of disease complications in this patient population are limited. In this study, we examined the disease course of children with JDM and anti-MDA5 antibodies before and after treatment with rituximab (RTX). METHODS: Patients aged 2-21 years and seen at the Children's Hospital at Montefiore between July 2012 and August 2021, with a diagnosis of JDM, positive anti-MDA5 antibodies, and evidence of ILD, and who were treated with RTX were eligible for inclusion. Retrospective clinical and laboratory data were reviewed. RESULTS: Five of 8 patients with positive anti-MDA5 antibodies had evidence of ILD (62.5%). Four patients had data available for review. All patients received at least 5 courses of RTX infusions, with discontinuation of steroids by an average of 12 months after starting RTX and a decrease to fewer than 2 concurrent medications by the fifth course of RTX. Indicators of ILD on high-resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function tests either improved or fully resolved over the course of RTX treatment for all patients. Patients also demonstrated resolution of active cutaneous manifestations and musculoskeletal disease activity. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the use of RTX in children with JDM and anti-MDA5 antibodies, with notable improvements in ILD, cutaneous, and musculoskeletal manifestations. Further studies are needed to better understand the efficacy of RTX for JDM disease-related complications.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the clinical presentation of juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests that infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may trigger idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Few studies have described individual juvenile IIM (JIIM) cases following SARS-CoV-2 infection, and none explored its potential effects on JIIM clinical presentation. We aim to investigate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on JIIM in patients diagnosed before and after the onset of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with JIIM before age 19 at The Children's Hospital at Montefiore were included. Demographics, clinical and laboratory data, and evidence of SARS-CoV-2 exposure were collected retrospectively. Patients were grouped by pre-COVID-19 (before January 1, 2020) and post-COVID-19 (January 1, 2020, or later). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize each variable. Non-parametric testing was performed using Fischer's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were included, 13 (25%) diagnosed in the post-COVID-19 era. Of these, 10 (77%) had onset of JIIM symptoms after January 1, 2020; 6 (60%) with known or suspected SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Though not statistically significant, post-pandemic patients tended to be older, female, and have non-specific cutaneous manifestations. Despite reported delays in care for other pediatric diagnoses during the pandemic, fewer post-pandemic patients had delays in JIIM diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to explore the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on JIIM clinical presentation. While our exploratory single-center study did not find significant differences in JIIM diagnosed pre- and post-pandemic, larger prospective multicenter studies are warranted to evaluate this association and to explore clinical variances over time.

Treatment escalation patterns to start biologics in refractory moderate juvenile dermatomyositis among members of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance.

BACKGROUND: Despite new and better treatments for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), not all patients with moderate severity disease respond adequately to first-line therapy. Those with refractory disease remain at higher risk for disease and glucocorticoid-related complications. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have become part of the arsenal of treatments for JDM. However, prospective comparative studies of commonly used biologics are lacking. METHODS: The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) JDM biologics workgroup met in 2019 and produced a survey assessing current treatment escalation practices for JDM, including preferences regarding use of biologic treatments. The cases and questions were developed using a consensus framework, requiring 80% agreement for consensus. The survey was completed online in 2020 by CARRA members interested in JDM. Survey results were analyzed among all respondents and according to years of experience. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used to compare the distribution of responses to each survey question. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one CARRA members responded to the survey (denominators vary for each question). Of the respondents, 88% were pediatric rheumatologists, 85% practiced in the United States, and 43% had over 10 years of experience. For a patient with moderately severe JDM refractory to methotrexate, glucocorticoids, and IVIG, approximately 80% of respondents indicated that they would initiate a biologic after failing 1-2 non-biologic DMARDs. Trials of methotrexate and mycophenolate were considered necessary by 96% and 60% of respondents, respectively, before initiating a biologic. By weighed average, rituximab was the preferred biologic over abatacept, tocilizumab, and infliximab. Over 50% of respondents would start a biologic by 4 months from diagnosis for patients with refractory moderately severe JDM. There were no notable differences in treatment practices between respondents by years of experience. CONCLUSION: Most respondents favored starting a biologic earlier in disease course after trialing up to two conventional DMARDs, specifically including methotrexate. There was a clear preference for rituximab. However, there remains a dearth of prospective data comparing biologics in refractory JDM. These findings underscore the need for biologic consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for refractory JDM, which will ultimately facilitate comparative effectiveness studies and inform treatment practices.

Myositis autoantibodies in a racially diverse population of children with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (JIIMs) is a group of autoimmune disorders, including juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), juvenile polymyositis (JPM) and overlap myositis, that are characterized by proximal muscle weakness, elevated levels of serum muscle enzymes, and pathognomonic skin findings. While the exact etiology of JIIMs is unclear, the presence of myositis specific autoantibodies (MSAs) have been associated with certain clinical phenotypes, organ involvement and disease prognosis. To date, there have been few studies of the associations between MSA presence and patient ethnicity. It is important to understand the extent to which ethnicity impacts disease manifestations, organ involvement and clinical outcomes. The goal of our study is to determine MSA and myositis associated autoantibody (MAA) presence, clinical phenotype, and disease course in a racially diverse population of pediatric patients with JIIMs. METHODS: Patients age 2-21 years with a prior diagnosis of JDM, JPM or overlap myositis, who had been tested for MSA/MAA, were eligible for study inclusion. Clinical and laboratory data were collected retrospectively via manual chart review in this single-center study. Descriptive statistics were performed to summarize each variable. Given the small sample size, non-parametric testing was performed using Fischer's exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test and Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Thirty one patients were included in the analysis. Race and ethnicity were self-reported as Hispanic (48.4%), white (25.8%), and Black (25.8%). The most prevalent MSAs were anti-MDA5 (25.8%), anti-p155/140 (22.6%) and anti-MJ (19.4%). Presence of autoantibodies (p = 0.04) and pulmonary disease (p = 0.03) were significantly higher in patients of Black or Hispanic descent compared with white descent. Anti-MDA5 antibodies, cutaneous ulceration, cardiopulmonary involvement, hospitalizations and one death were only reported in patients with Black or Hispanic descent. Patients with anti-MDA5 antibodies were more likely to be male (p = 0.04) and to have cutaneous ulceration (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the prevalence of MSA/MAA in a racially diverse group of patients with JIIM and further delineates clinical phenotype and disease complications in these groups. We found a relatively high proportion of children with anti-MDA5 antibodies and described potentially worse clinical courses in children of Black or Hispanic descent. Further investigation is warranted to examine these findings.

Minimal difference in pain associated with change in quality of life in children with rheumatic disease.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the minimal change on a pain visual analog scale (VAS) associated with change in self-reported quality of life in pediatric rheumatology patients. METHODS: Subjects were a cohort of 533 pediatric rheumatology patients in Toronto. Pain and perceived quality of life were measured at 2 consecutive visits to a clinic. RESULTS: Among patients who rated quality of life at the second visit as "a little better" and "much better," the mean change in pain score on a 10-cm VAS was reduced by 0.82 and 1.45 cm, respectively. For those whose quality of life changed to "a little worse" and "much worse," the pain scores increased by 1.90 and 3.69 cm. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that future studies of the assessment and treatment of pain in this population should aim for a minimum reduction in pain score of 0.82 cm on a 10-cm VAS to achieve clinical improvement in quality of life.